Prince William (left) and Kate Middleton
Speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the situation and because he had not been authorised by the Palace to hold forth on the matter, Prince Charles said he was “delighted” to hear of William and Kate’s engagement. “It came as a complete surprise to me”, he said, speaking off the record.
William is second in line of succession to the throne after Charles himself. Charles has been waiting for some time to gain access to the throne (how long, oh Lord, how long?) but the present incumbent shows little or no sign of wishing to evacuate the premises.
In the meantime, a long line of pretenders has been forming, all seeking access to the throne. Given the congestion, and with a view to providing some measure of “relief”, it has been mooted that an extra throne be installed. Again speaking on condition of anonymity, the Prince of Wales has suggested that the two thrones could be entitled “Ladies” and “Gentlemen”.
The PofW seems to be having some difficulty with the concept of anonymity!
ReplyDeleteAnd have you seen that Tom Jones has graciously offered to "sing" at the wedding?
Greetings Barnaby
ReplyDeleteIt might take much swallowing of pride but if dad steps aside to enable older son to accede to the Throne at the apt time (long live the Queen!) no end of good would be done imho to the monarchy. Logically the monarchy is out of step with the times in C21 but the UK benefits enormously from this illogical institution as a quick look at what happens elsewhere confirms. Prince Charles stepping aside in favour of his son could prove a great fillip (no pun intended) and rejuvenation to the whole institution.
Yes, but Jerry, when exactly should Prince Charles announce his decision to "step aside"?. Now or, as you put it, "at the apt time"?
ReplyDeleteNothing like the present Barnaby
ReplyDeleteBut perhaps HRH Prince Charles should consult HMQ about the timing.